Supreme Court of India
Dinabandhu Sahu v. Jadumoni Mangaraj and Others.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India-Article 136-Supreme Court-If and when can interfere with findings of facts in appeal-Representati'on of the People Act (XUI! of 1951), ss. 85, 90( 4)-Requisites and finality of condanation of delay under s. 85 and powers conferred thereunder-Scope and extent of powers given to an Election T ribtt nal under s. 90(4). Held, that the Supreme Court does not, when hearing appeals under Article 136 of the Constitution, sit as a Court of further appeal on facts, and does not interfere with findings given on a con sideration of evidence, unless they are perverse or based on no…
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Shivamma (dead) by Lrs. v. Karnataka Housing Board
- 2000 Surendra Chauhan v. State of M.p
- 1967 Sarpanch,. Lonand Grampanchayat v. Ramgiri Gosavi & Anr.
- 1955 Bhikaji Keshao Joshi and Another v. Brijlal Nandlal Biyani and Others.
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.