Supreme Court of India
The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Naim
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
High Court-Inherent power in criminal cases-Remarks in Judgment-Duty of Judge.-Expunging remarks-Power of High Court-State Government, if can apply-Cork of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), •· 561- . While disposing of a criminal appeal the High Court directed the issue of a notice to N, the investigating officer, to show cause why a •omplaint should not be instituted against him under s. 195, Indian Penal Code.…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 P. Radhakrishnan & Anr. v. Cochin Devaswom Board & Ors.
- 2024 Sonu Agnihotri v. Chandra Shekhar & Ors.
- 2011 Lanka Venkateswarlu (d) by Lrs. v. State of A.P. & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.