Supreme Court of India
Koteswar Vittal Kamath v. K. Rangappa Baliga & Co.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
16 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the Prohi bition Order of 1950 was invalid, the previous Prohibition Order of 1119 cannot be held to be revived.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Travancore-Cochin Public ·Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950, s. 3- Validity of-Constitution of India, Art, 304(b) proviso-Bill introduced tn pre-Constitution period-Amended by Select Committee-Moved again and passed in post·ConstUution period-President's sanction when re· quired-Travancore-Cochin Vegetable Oils and Oilcakes (Forward Con tracts Prohibition) Order, 1950--Continuance of. The Vegetable Oils and Oilseeds (Forward Contracts Prohibition) Order.…
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Mr. Rajendra K. Bhutta v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority through its Chairman & Anr.
- 2017 Nabha Power Limited (npl) v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (pspcl) & Anr.
- 2011 State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. v. K. Shyam Sunder & Ors.
- 2025 Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar (dead) and Others v. Union of India and Others
- 2024 Property Owners Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2024 Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal
- 2024 Pernod Ricard India (p) Ltd. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- 2021 Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2026 Rajesh Sharma v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
- 2026 Jagdish Prasad v. P.M. Manoj Kumar
- 2023 Income Tax Officer v. Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia
- 2020 Rajneesh Khajuria v. M/s. Wockhardt Ltd. & Anr.
- 2019 The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Trilok Ram
- 2004 Zile Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- 1996 State of Ratasthan v. Mangilal Pindwal
- 1976 State of Maharashtra Etc. v. The Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd.
Of those, 3 relied on · 5 referred to · 8 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.