Supreme Court of India
Vaman Dattatry Gadagkar v. Director General of Posts, Bombay
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant is entitled to the benefit of FR 22-c and accordingly his pay should be fixed when he was promoted as LSG Accountant.
Judgment, page 2
From the headnote
JUDGMENT: J U M N T VENKATASWAMI, J. The appellant approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Bombay Bench, by filling O. .NO.96/87 along with five others. The relief sought before the Tribunal by the appellant was that he was that he was entitled take advantage of time Bound once promotion scheme (for short ’TBOP scheme’) introduced by the respondent-department on 17.12.83 The other relief sought was that as and when he is promoted as lower selection Grade Accountant the benefit of special pay and also application of FR 22-c must be given to him.…
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.