Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, J8(j()-Sections 302, 201-Appeal against acquittal by High Court-Circumstantial evidence-Ingredients-Links of chain of circumstan ces established-Offences proved. - Penal Code, J8(j()-Sections 302, 201-Conviction of accused by Trial f Court-Acquittal by High Court-Appeal against High Court's judgment suf- fering from illegality-Delay in disposal of appeal-Whether a ground for +...-- non-inteiference of the findings of High Court. c The prosecutions's case was that the accused-respondent was a private medical practitioner and the deceased was his second wife.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Wazir Khan v. State of Uttarakhand
- 2013 Ravirala Laxmaiah v. State of A.P.
- 2017 Satish Nirankari v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.