Supreme Court of India
Shivappa Tammannappa Karaban v. Parasappa Hanammappa Kuraban and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the appellant has no exclusive right to the property and accordingly, we do G not find any illegality in the decree for partition granted by the court below.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Kamataka Village Offices Abolition Act,. 1961-Sections 4 and 5- Holder of village office as Walikarki-Abolition of village office-Consequen- ces-Regrant made in name of holder of office-Property continued to be joint c family property for benefit of Hindu joint family-Grant of ryotwari patta-f'roperty became partible subject to conditions u/s 5(3). The appellant was recorded as an holder of an village office as Walikarki.…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 N. Padmamma & Ors. v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy & Ors.
- 1995 Sh. Lokraj and Ors. v. Kishan Lal and Ors.
- 1995 Annasaheb Bapusaheb Patil and Ors. v. Balwant@ Balasaheb Babusaheb Patil (dead) by Lrs. and Heirs Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.