Supreme Court of India

M/s Neyvely Lignite Corpn. Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. Special Tahsildar (land Acquisition) Neyvely and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Neutral citation
Bench K. Ramaswamy, M.K. Mukherjee and S.C. Sen JJ.
Decided 19 October 1994

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the considered view that the appellant-company is an interested person within the meaning of s.3(b) H 580 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1994) SUPP. 4 S.C.R. A of the Act and is also a proper party, if not a necessary party under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC. The High Court had committed manifest error of law in holding that the appellant is not a person interested.

Judgment, page 13

From the headnote

LandAcquisitionAct, 1894: Sections 3(b), 4(1), 11, 18, 26, 50(2) and 'Person interested'-Scope of c Held authority for whose benefit land is acquired is person interested within the meaning of Section 3(b )--Beneficiary for whose benefit land is acquired is entitled to come on record to lead evidence for determination of proper compensation-Denial of right to a person interested is in negation of fair and just procedure offending Article 14.

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.