Supreme Court of India
Smt. Abhilash Vinod Kumar Jain Etc. v. Cox and Kings (india) Ltd. and Ors. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that a1 petition under Section 630 of the Act is maintainable against the legal heirs M the deceased officer/employee for retrieval of the company's property wrongfully with hold by them after the demise of the employee concerned.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Companies Act, 1956: S.63lr-Allotment of premises by Company to its employeej Employees dying in hamess-Failure of legal heirs to hand, over vacant possession-Company launching prosecution for retrieval of company's property-Maimainability of-Ambit and scope of S.63o-Quashing of the proceedings-Power of the High Court-Cr.P. .-S.482. Interpretation of Statutes: Beneficient provision-Interpretation of-Duty of Court to defend the law from clever· evasion and def eat and to prevent perpetration of a legal fraud-Court to be ever alive to this principle.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.