Supreme Court of India
Guru Bipin Singh v. Sh. Chongtham Manihar Singh and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting, we desire to state that it w_ould behove the appellant to make a public statement, as was his offer during the abortive compromise talk, that the manuscript was not in the hand of Rajarshi D Bhagyachandra and he undertakes not to state so in future.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 : Sections 420, 465, 468 and 500-Seeking initiation of Criminal Proceedings-Earlier a Complaint had been filed, which had ended in compromise with tendering of apology-Repetition of same offence alleged-Whether fresh cause of action accrned-Held, no legally admissible evidence availablr-Commission of forgery under Section 463 has to be there-Making of any false document or a part thereof must-In absence of forgery the allegation under Section 420 would fail-Section 468 intimately connected with Sections 420 and 465. c Evidence Act : Section 33-Proviso-Reliance sought to be…
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.