Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Mahboob S. Allibhoy and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 : S. 19-Appea/ against order dropping proceedings for contempt or refus- ing to initiate proceedings for contempt-Held, not maintainab/e--But person initiating contempt proceedings is not without any remedy-Jn appropriate cases he can invoke jurisdiction of Court under Article 136 of the Constitu tion-However, the instant case does not merit inteiference. Constitution of India : A1ticle 136-Proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 dropped or petition for initiating contempt proceedings dismissed-Remedy to person initiating contempt proceedings-Held, in…
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Tukaram Dnyaneshwar Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2006 Midnapore Peoples' Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors. v. Chunilal Nanda and Ors.
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.