Supreme Court of India
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shri J. L. Sharma and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the aforesaid premises the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal is set aside and O.A. No. 109 ofl 987 stands dismissed. It is held that the training period of the direct recruits shall be counted for determining the seniority in the service provided of course the said direct recruit successfully completes the training and then is absorbed in Class II Forest Service. This appeal is allowed but in the circumstances there will be no order as to costs.
Judgment, p. 180 B-C
From the headnote
Service Law Himachal Pradesh Forest Service (Class II) Recruitment, Promotion and Certain Conditions of Service Rules, 1966-Rule (4), Schedule, Column (10)-Seniority-Direct Recruits-Training period-For the purpose of seniority-'In service'-Interpretation of-Held, for the purpose of seniority training period will be treated as part of service-Constitution of India, 1950-Art. 309. The respondents were class II promotee officers of the Himachal Pradesh Forest Service, governed by the Himachal Pradesh Forest Service (Class II) Recruitment Promotion and Certain Conditions of Service Rules, 1966.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.