Supreme Court of India
Sushma Suri Etc. Etc. v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons stated therein, these appeals also stand C disposed of in the same terms as set forth in that case.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: Article 233(2).,.-Delhi Higher Judicial Service-Appointment of-Eligibility-Officers from Delhi Judicial Service or Advocate Pleader of not less than seven years standing-Public prosecutor/ Government Counsels/Standing Counsels of Corporation or Authority-Acting or pleading in the Courts on behalf of employers-Held, he is an advocate for the purpose of Article 233(2)-Thus entitled to be considered for appointment to Delhi Higher Judicial Service-Advocates Act, 1961; Section 2(a)-Bar Council of India Rules: Rule 9.
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Dheeraj Mor v. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi
- 2018 Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2012 Union of India and Others v. S. Srinivasan
- 2012 Mahesh Chandra Verma & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.