Supreme Court of India
The Daily Pratap v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1959: Preamble-Held, Act is a beneficial social welfare legislation. Section 2(b) Exception (ii) and Section 6-Definition of"basic wages" Applicability of-Production Bonus Scheme-Extra payment made to workmen under Production Bonus Scheme-Employer under Exception (ii) of Section 2(b) and hence no provident fund contribution was required to be payable on such extra payment-Held, extra payment under the Sr;heme made at a flat rate and not on sliding scale proportionate to extra output-Such payment was not exempted from provident fund…
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 The Officer in Charge, Sub-regional Provident Fund Office & Anr. v. M/s Godavari Garments Limited
- 2019 Mishra and Navin Sinha, Jj.] v. Vivekananda Vidyamandir and Others
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.