Supreme Court of India

State through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/sit Etc. v. Nalini and Ors. Etc. Etc.

Neutral citation
Bench K.T. Thomas, D.P. Wadhwa and Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JJ.
Decided 11 May 1999
Status Distinguished

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

21 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that Nalini (A-1), Santhan (A- 2), Murugan (A-3) and Arivu (A-18) are guilty they do not deserve the extreme penalty.

Judgment, page 384

From the headnote

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) ACT. 1987: Ss. 15, 21-Evidentiary value of confession recorded by Police Officer under S. 15 against its maker and against co-accused, abettor or Conspirator-Effect of non-obstante clause in S. 15(1)-S. 30 of Evidence Act, whether excluded-Amending Act 43 of J993-Addition of words "or co­ accused, abettor or conspirator" in S. J 5 (1) and deletion of clauses (c) and (d) of S. 2 J-Effect of-Confession of an accused-Admissibility as a substantive evidence against himself as well as a co-accused, abettor or Conspirator.

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 6 relied on · 1 distinguished · 11 referred to · 2 mentioned · 1 not applicable

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.