Supreme Court of India
Rajendra Prasad v. The Narcotic Cell through its Officer Incharge, Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 311-Prosecution seeking resummoning of witnesses after evidence was closed-Whether power under this Section can be exercised to fill up lacuna in Prosecution case-Held : oversight or mistakes during conducting of case cannot be understood as lacuna and can be corrected. Words & Phrases. "Lucuna in Prosecution case"-Meaning of Appellant along with certain other persons was tried. before a Court of Sessions for offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psych'otropic Substance Act, 1985.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2016 State of Haryana v. Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
- 2014 Mannan Sk & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- 2013 Sister Mina Lalita Baruwa v. State of Orissa and Others
- 2013 Natasha Singh v. Cbi (state)
- 2012 Deepak Khinchi v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 5 relied on · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.