Supreme Court of India
Yoginath D. Bagde v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law : Maharashtra Civil Service (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1979-Rule c 9(2) Dismissal-Judicial Officer-Charged for indulging in corrupt practices-Departmental enquiry-Enquiry Officer's finding that charges were not established-Disciplinary Committee of High Court disagreeing with the findings of Enquiry Officer, recommending punishment of dismissal-Show cause notice to delinquent officer-No opportunity of hearing provided before final decision-Validity of-Held, it is obligatory on the Disciplinary Committee to afford opportunity of hearing before reversing the finding of Enquiry…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Nirbhay Singh Suliya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2014 Renu & Ors. v. District & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari & Anr.
- 2013 S.P. Malhotra v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
- 2013 Nirmala J. Jhala v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- 2025 Durga Prasad v. Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
- 2004 J.A. Naiksatam v. Prothonotary & Senior Master, High Court of Bombay and Ors.
Of those, 4 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.