Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : Section 102-Police officer-Power to seize property- 'Property' Include Bank account and therefore capable of being seized-Applicability of Section 102-Necessary conditions for. Accused-Commission of offences-Investigation-Seizure by Police Officer-Instructions by Investigating Officer prohibiting operation of Bank account-Held legal. Words & Phrases: 'Property '-Meaning of-Section 102-Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.…
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Teesta Atul Setalvad v. The State of Gujarat
- 2024 Shento Varghese v. Julfikar Husen & Ors.
- 2019 Nevada Properties Private Limited through its Director v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.