Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Hoshan, A.P. and Anr. v. State of A.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the trial court committed manifest error in disbelieving E the dying declaration (Exbt P/2) and the evidence of PWs 3 to.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860; Sections 304- , 306 and 498- : Abetment to suicide W!fe subjected to cruelty by husband-Suicide by burning-Charges against husband and his mother-Acquittal by trial Court on benefit of doubt-High Court o.n re-appreciation of evidence found them guilty of committing cruelty on deceased-wife and convicted under Section 306 and 498- but confirmed acquittal under Section 304- -On appeal, held, cruelty is essentially a question of fact-Mental cruelty varies from person to person depending upon the sensitivity and degree of endurance to withstand such cruelty-High Court rightly…
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Jayesh Kanna v. The Assistant Commissioner Law and Order (west)
- 2009 Undavali Narayana Rao v. State of A.P.
- 2009 Manju Ram Kalita v. State of Assam
- 2006 Sahebrao and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.