Supreme Court of India
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Avadh Kishore Gupta and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 482/Prevention of . Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(e): Petition to quash the investigation and the proceedings against a Government Servant under Prevention of Corruption Act-High Court quashed the proceedings holding that the evidence collected does not suggest that if prosecuted the Government servant would be liable for conviction-On appeal, Held: Since no procedural enactment could be exhaustive, inherent powers vested with the Courts to do the right and to undo the wrong while administering justice-However, no inflexible rule governing…
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Dr. Maroti S/o Kashinath Pimpalkar
- 2022 Musstt Rehana Begum v. State of Assam & Anr.
- 2017 State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors.
- 2022 Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
- 2011 Harshendra Kumar D. v. Rebatilata Koley Etc.
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.