Supreme Court of India
Maulavi Hussein Haji Abraham Umari v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002; Sections 3 and 49(2)/Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Sections 73 and 167: Charges under POTA-Petitionfor extending police remand beyond 30 days period-Allowed by trial Court-Affirmed by High Court-On appeal, Held: Court could interpret the law but cannot legislate it- Legislature casus omissus should neither be supplied by judicial interpretation nor should it be readily inferred to make it a consistent enactment-However, a casus omissus, if occurs, must be disposed of according to law as existed before enactment of the statute-Provision for extending…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Thalappalam Ser. Coop. Bank Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Ors.
- 2008 Union of India and Ors. v. M/s Dharamendra Textile Processors and Ors.
- 2013 Mrs. Sarah Mathew v. The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases by its Director - Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.