Supreme Court of India
M.P. High Court Bar Association v. Union of India and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that it was within D the power of the State Government to continue or not to continue State Administrative Tribunal and it was open to the State Government to take such a decision, it cannot be set aside merely on the ground that such a decision was not advisable in the facts of the case or that other decision could have been taken.
Judgment, page 40
From the headnote
M.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000 : Section 74(1). Abolition of State Administrative Tribunal-Constitutionality of-Held : Not ultra vires Art. 323- or any other part of the Constitution-Further, L. Chandra Kumar's case did not lay down that once a Tribunal is constituted, created or established, there was no power either in the Central Government or the State Governments to abolish it-Constitution of India, 1950, Art, 323- -Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, S. 4(2).
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association v. Union of India & Others
- 2023 Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.