Supreme Court of India
Raju Pandurang Mahale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, 1860: Sections 342134 and 354134-Wrongful confinement and assault or criminal force on -woman with intent to outrage her modesty-Prosecutrix taken to house of one of the accused on false pretext by appellant in the night of occurrence-Appellant and another accused assaulted prosecutrix and made her to consume liquor-Prosecutrixforcibly disrobed and thereafter raped by one of the accused in the presence of appellant-She was able to come out of the confinement on the next day-Held, the factual scenario clearly establishes coi11missi0n by the appellant of the offences…
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Asif Khan v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2013 Ajahar Ali v. State of West Bengal
- 2025 Naresh Aneja @ Naresh Kumar Aneja v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2007 Ramkripal S/o Shyamlal Charmakar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2006 Tarakeshwar Sahu v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
Of those, 2 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.