Supreme Court of India
Bijender Singh v. State of Haryana and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000-Juvenile Justice Act, I 986-Juvenile-Male juvenile and female juvenile-Distinction between, on the basis of age obliterated under the 2000 Act-Separate age limits of l 6 years for male juveniles and I 8 years for female juveniles as in the repealed l 986 Act not maintained in the 2000 Act-Age limit is l 8 years for both male and female juveniles. Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000-Sections 20 & 1(3)-Juvenile Justice Act, 1986-Applicabi/ity of the 2000 Act to cases pending under the repealed 1986 Act-Held…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- 2013 Bharat Bhushan v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2022 Vinod Katara v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2019 Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri (d) through Shakuntala Alias Sushma & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department & Ors.
- 2016 Mumtaz @ Muntyaz v. State of U.P. (now Uttarakhand)
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.