Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka and Anr. v. Sangappa Dyavappa Biradar and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: ss. 11 (2) and (I 8)-Consent award-Compensation received by land holders in full satisfaction of their claim-Applications for reference in terms of s. I 8 for enhancement of compensation-Held, not maintainable-Cond(tion precedent for maintaining application for reference u/s I 8 is non-acceptance of award by the awardee-For passing a consent award, it is not necessary to comply with provisions of Article 299 of the Constitution-Nor an agree1i1ent between the parties need be strictly in terms of a prescribed formqt- Constitution of India-Article 299-Government…
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 The Government of Tamil Nadu v. P.R. Jaganathan
- 2016 Ranveer Singh v. State of U.P. through Secy. & Ors.
- 2005 Union of India v. Pramod Gupta (d) by Lrs. and Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.