Supreme Court of India
Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Susheel Kumar Gabgotra and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs.
Judgment, p. 609
From the headnote
Consumer Protection: J & K Consumer Protection Act, 1988-Section 17-Deficiency in service-Defect found in car within warranty period-Company and its authorised dealer failed to get the defect removed-Direction of High Court to Company to get the car replaced-Propriety of-Held, not proper-Warranty condition relied upon by Customer provided for repair or replacement of the defective part and not replacement of the car itself-Customer permitted to get the defective part replaced free of cost from authorised service centre of Company-Also awarded consolidated sum of Rs.…
Authorities it was built on
- 1997 Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Anr. v. Gajanan Y. Mandrekar
- Jose Phillip Mumpillil v. Premier Automobiles Ltd
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Tata Motors Ltd. v. Antonio Paulo Vaz and Anr.
- 2010 C.N. Anantharam v. M/s. Fiat India Ltd. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.