Supreme Court of India
P. Narayanappa and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Land Acquisition: Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966-Sections 28(/) and 28(4)-Notifications under-Challenged for not mentioning complete details of project and purpose of acquisition-Held: At the time of acquisition of land and issuing preliminary Notification complete details of project and purpose of acquisition need not be mentioned-It is to be seen whether land is acquired for development by Board or for any other purpose in furtherance of the objects of the Act-Notification clearly mentioned that land was acquired for establishment and development of industries-Thus…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 M/s. M.S.P.L. Limited v. The State of Karnataka and Ors.
- 2017 Satish Kumar Gupta Etc. Etc. v. State of Haryana & Ors. Etc.
- 2015 Peerappa Hanmantha Harijan (d) by Lrs. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka&anr.
Of those, 2 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.