Supreme Court of India
Bhimappa Chandappa Hosamani and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-,Sections 302 and 34-Accused charged for murder Trial Court acquitted the accused holding that PW I is not a truthful eyewitness and that PW 2 was not an eyewitness-High Court held PWs I and 2 as . truthfit! eyewitnesses and convicted the accused-Correctness of-Held. on· re-appreciation of evidence, PW 2 cannot be said to be an eyewitness c:nd PW I is not a truthfirl eyeu:itness-Hence, accused are acquitted.…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Mitesh @ T.v.vaghela v. The State of Gujarat
- 2010 Mannu Sao v. State of Bihar
- 2007 Namdeo v. State of Maharashtra
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.