Supreme Court of India
Chairman, U.P. Jal Nigam and Anr. v. Jaswant Singh and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India-Article 226-Writ Petitions by employees challenging their age of superannuation at 58 years on the ground that the age of superannuation of the State Government employees is 60 years-Supreme Court in Harwindra Kumar v. Chief Engineer, Karmik & Ors., [2005) 13 SCC 300 held the superannuation age to be 60 years-Writ Petitions by employees, who retired long time back and accepted post-retirement benefits, claiming payment of salary for the two years in the light of the Supreme Court judgment High Court allowed the Writ Petitions -Correctness of-Held, employees are not…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Union of India and Others v. N Murugesan Etc.
- 2020 Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- 2017 Mahavir & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2013 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dayanand Chakrawarty & Ors.
- 2021 New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Anr. v. B D Singhal & Ors.
- 2017 M/s. Shoeline v. Commissioner of Service Tax and Ors.
- 2011 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 4 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.