Supreme Court of India
Dilip and Anr. v. State of M.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Ss. 8118, 42, 50 and 57: Search and seizure of Narcotic Drugs-Recovery of Opium-Arrest of accused-Acquitted by trial Court holding that the search and seizure vitiated in law for non-compliance of mandatory statutory requirements in terms of provisions of the Act-Reversed by High Court-On appeal, Held: Witnesses to the seizure did not support the case of prosecution and declared hostile- High Court without assigning any reasons held that the provisions of Section 42 and also Section 50 of the Act are not required to be complied with First…
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand & Anr.
- 2020 Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana
- 2018 S. K. Raju @ Abdul Haque @ Jagga v. State of West Bengal
- 2010 Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 distinguished · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.