Supreme Court of India
Babubhai Udesinh Parmar v. State of Gujarat
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal procedure, 1973; Ss. 164 and 313: Rape and murder of a minor girl-Judicial confession-Trial Court found accused guilty of committing offences of rape and murder and imposed death penalty-Affirmed by High Court-On appeal, Held: Apart from purported confession, no other material was sufficient to establish guilt of the accused-Inconsistencies appeared in prosecution case vis-a-vis purported confession-Oath administered to accused which is prohibited in law-It assumes significance since his evidence on oath also recorded- judicial confession admissible in evidence and treated as…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
- 2010 S. Arul Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2008 Vinod Solanki v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2008 Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2007 Bishnu Prasad Sinha & Anr. v. State of Assam
- 2006 Aloke Nath Dutta and Ors. v. State of West Bengal
Of those, 7 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.