Supreme Court of India
Gagan Kanojia and Anr. v. State of Punjab
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860; Ss. 34, 201, 302 and 364/Evidence Act, 1872; Ss. 8 and 27/Evidence Act, 1872; Ss.' 8 and 27: Kidnapping and murder-Children picked up by their relative who allegedly committed their murder-Circumstantial evidence-Appreciation of-Charges-Proving of-Held: Charges could be proved on the basis of circumstantial evidence provided direct evidence not available-Prosecution case must be judged having regard to totality of the circumstances-In doing so, the Court must adopt an integrated approach by using yardstick of probability, appreciate intrinsic value of evidence and analyze…
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Tarun Sharma v. State of Haryana
- 2025 The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balveer Singh
- 2024 Selvamani v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.