Supreme Court of India
State of M.P. and Ors. v. Laut Kumar Verma
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the interest of justice would be sub-served if we direct C that any benefit which has already been given to the respondent shall not be recovered.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Labour Law: Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960: c Standard Standing Order-Clause 2-Dai/y wager-Termination of services-Claim for regularization and for classification as permanent clerk Allowed by Labour Court and High Court-Held, workman having not been appointed in terms of statutory rules, nor against a clear vacancy, Labour Court and High Court were not correct in directing regularization-Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-s.25- -Constitution of India-Article 16.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Siraj Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- 2016 State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors v. District Bar Association, Bandipora
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.