Supreme Court of India
Mahila Vinod Kumari v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 340 & 3441 Penal Code, 1960: s. 376 Perjury - Petitioner lodging a report against two persons c for committing rape - Resiled from statement made during investigation - Acquitting accused persons trial Court directed to take cognizance against piosecutrix in terms of S. 344 of the Code -Admission of guilt by petitioner - Trial Court found -~ 1 prosecutrix guilty of committing the offence of perjury, sen- tenced her to undergo imprisonment for 3 months - Appeal dismissed by High Court - Correctvero of of - Held: Correct - The purpose of enacting S. 344 Cr.
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.