Supreme Court of India
Bholu Ram v. State of Punjab & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons , the appeal deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.
Judgment, page 33
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 319, 197 and 482 - Recalling order of issuance of summons against person other than accused - Permissibility of - Held: Order passed by competent court issuing summons cannot be recalled - Aggrieved party can challenge the order by invoking inherent jurisdiction of High Court u/s. 482 - On facts, Revisional Court and High Court not justified in recalling summoning order passed by Magistrate against Head Master-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer other than accused-clerk in Government School - Accused in a complaint alleging forgery and cheating, filed application to add respondent as accused and summon him.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 State of Rajasthan v. Vinod Kumar
- 2019 State of Gujarat v. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta
- 2013 Urmila Devi v. Yudhvir Singh
- 2013 Bharati Tamang v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.