Supreme Court of India
Sanjay Kumar Kedia @ Sanjay Kedia v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: c s. 36- (4), proviso - Extension of custody to complete investigation - Conditions to be satisfied - Held: In the instant case, there was no application of mind by the public prosecutor - Progress of investigation was not indicated - Compelling reasons which required extension of custody 0 beyond 180 days were not shown - Both the extensions being contrary to law, struck down. s. 36- (4), proviso read with s. 167 (2) Cr. P. . - Application for bail on the ground that investigation was not completed within the extended time - Extensions…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 The State of Maharashtra v. Surendra Pundlik Gadling & Ors.
- 2018 Achpal @ Ramswaroop & Another v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.