Supreme Court of India
Yunus (baboobhai) A Hamid Padvekar v. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid position we are not inclined to - interfere in this appeal which is dismissed accordingly. ... G.N. Appeal dismissed .
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
LANO ACQUISITION: Land acquired for Industrial development - Representation of release of the land - Committee appointed c by Legislative Assembly for considering the representation - Meanwhile Writ Petition filed in High Court - High Court dismissing the Writ Petition on the ground that it was highly belated - On appeal, Held: Unexplained delay coupled with creation of third party rights in the meantime is an important factor which weighs with the High Court - Hence no interference called for - Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 - S.39(2a).
Where later benches applied it
- 2010 Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Chennai v. M. Meiyappan and Ors.
- 2020 Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board and Another v. Vijay Bodana and Others
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.