Supreme Court of India

Surinder Singh Brar and Others Etc.etc. v. Union of India and Others

Neutral citation
Bench G.S. Singhvi and Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya JJ.
Decided 11 October 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the D Adviser to the Administrator was not competent to accord approval to the initiation of the acquisition proceedings or take decision on the reports submitted by the LAO under Section 5-A (2) of the Act and record his satisfaction that the land was needed for the specified public purpose.

Judgment, page 76

From the headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss.4, SA and 6 - Land Acquisition in Union Territory of Chandigarh - Power of the Administrator of the Union Territory of Chandigarh to sanction acquisition - Held: Acquisition of land for and on behalf of Union Territories must be sanctioned by the Administrator of the particular Union Territory - No other officer competent to exercise the power vested in 'the appropriate Government' under the Act and the Rules framed thereunder - Nothing in language of s.3(1) of the 1987 Act from which it can be inferred that the Administrator of the Union Territory of…

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.