Supreme Court of India
Narain Pandey v. Pannalal Pandey
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
The order passed by the Disciplinary Committee, BCI is modified and the respondent-advocate is awarded punishment for his professional misconduct, as indicated above. Civil Appeal is allowed to that extent with no order as to costs.
Judgment, para 19
From the headnote
Advocates: Professional misconduct - Punishment - Advocate filing Vakalatnamas without any authority and subsequently filing fictitious compromises - Also reprimanded previously by Disciplinary Committee of BCI - Disciplinary Committee of State Bar Council holding the charges proved and debarring the advocate from practice for 7 years - DC, BCI, modifying the punishment by reprimand and costs of Rs.1000/- - Held: In view of the specific finding recorded by Disciplinary Committee of State Bar Council, the professional misconduct committed by the advocate is extremely grave and serious - He deserves punishment commensurate with degree of misconduct that meets the twin objectives; i.e. deterrence and correction - Advocate debarred from practice for 3 years from date - Administration of justice - Practice and Procedure.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.