Supreme Court of India
Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: c s.438 - Power under - Purpose and scope of - FIR u/s. 420, 467, 468 and 471 /PC - Anticipatory bail granted on the condition that the accused would deposit Rs. one crore in fixed deposit in the name of the complainant - Propriety of the condition - Held: Object of putting conditions while granting 0 bail, is to avoid possibility of the person hampering the investigation - Thus any condition which has no reference to the fairness or propriety of the investigation or trial, cannot be countenanced as permissible under law - Therefore, condition of deposit for…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Ankita Kailash Khandelwal and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- 2020 Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2023 Ramesh Kumar v. State of Nct of Delhi
- 2022 Mohammed Zubair v. State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
- 2021 Aparna Bhat & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.