Supreme Court of India

Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust ® & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Neutral citation
Bench R.M. Lodha, A.K. Patnaik, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya Dipak Misra and Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla JJ.
Decided 6 May 2014

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the Constitution (Ninety-third Amendment) Act, 2005 inserting clause (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution and the Constitution (Eighty-Sixth Amendment) Act, H 764 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 11 S.C.R. A 2002 inserting Article 21 A of the Constitution do not alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution and are constitutionally valid.

Judgment, page 52

From the headnote

Constitution of India, 1950: Art. 15(5) [as inserte.d by Constitution (Ninty-Third Amendment) Act, 2005] and Arts. 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 - Constitutional validity of Art. 15(5) - Held: Art. 15(5) does not alter the basic structure and framework of the Constitution - The provision is also not violative of the concept of secularism - None of the rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 have been abrogated by clause (5) of Article 15 and hence, it is constitutionally valid.

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.