Supreme Court of India
Indra Vijay Alok v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that merely for the reason that DW-6 Sahir has not supported prosecution case, the ring of truth in the prosecution case is not shaken in the present case, B particularly, when the statements of remaining witnesses are credible and trustworthy.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Prevention of Coffuption Act, 1988: ss. 7 and 13(1 )(d) rlw c s. 13(2) - Allegation that appellant-Patwari demanded from the complainant bribe for carrying out the mutation in the revenue records - Trial Court found the evidence of complainant (PW-3) and statements of other prosecution witnesses reliable for holding the appellant guilty- Conviction by trial court upheld by the High Court - On appeal, held: The statement of PW-3 got corroboration by the statement of the superior officer of the appellant's own department-As such courts below committed no error of law in relying on testimony of…
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.