Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Ramlal Devappa Rathod and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result this appeal is partly allowed as against Accused Nos.A-1, A-2, A-3, A-12, A-29 and A-.
Judgment, page 33
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860- ss. 147, 148, 302, 307, 324, 326, 427, 435, 436, 452 rlw s. 149- Prosecution under- Of 34 accused-Assault by mob, causing death of one person and injuries to others (eye-witnesses)- During trial 9 of the eye witnesses including injured-eyewitnesses turned hostile as regards the identity of the accused persons - The sole eye- witness PW-12 supported the prosecution case - Trial court convicted the 8 respondents-accused, while acquitting the rest of the accused - High Court acquitted the respondents accused disbelieving the testimony of PW-12 - On appeal, held: The testimony…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Killu @ Kailash and Ors.
- 2021 State of Rajasthan v. Bablu @ Om Prakash
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.