Supreme Court of India
Kamil v. State of Uttar Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 464 – Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge – On facts, conviction of accused u/s. 302/34 IPC – However, omission to frame charge u/s. 302, though the gist of the charge sheet filed against the accused clearly showed that the accused has been charged for the said offence – Maintainability of conviction u/s. 302 – Held: Conviction for the substantive offence without a charge can be set aside only if the accused shows that prejudice has been caused to him and that “failure of justice” has occasioned thereby – No such submission was…
Authorities it was built on
- 1955 Willie (william) Slaney v. The State of Madhya Pradesh.
- 2001 Shamnshaeb M. Multtani v. State of Karnataka
- 1998 State of A.P. Etc. v. Thakkidiram Reddy and Ors. Etc.
- 2012 Darbara Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2012 Bhimanna v. State of Karnataka
- 1988 State of West Bengal & Anr. v. Laisal Haque & Ors. Etc.
- 2008 Dumpala Chandra Reddy v. Nimakayala Balireddy and Ors.
- 2005 Punjab State Electricily Board v. Darbara Singh
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.