Supreme Court of India
Netram Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the foregoing discussion, we cannot agree with the reasoning and the conclusion arrived at by the High Court which is legally unsustainable.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – s.2(e) r/w s.2A – Qualified service – Appellant rendered 22 years as daily wager and 3 years as regular work charge employee i.e. he was regularised 3 years prior to his retirement – Whether appellant can be said to have rendered qualified service i.e. continuous service as specified in s.2(e) r/w s.2A so as to make him eligible to claim gratuity as provided under the Act from the State – Held: Appellant actually rendered total service for a period of 25 years and the State actually regularized his services – Having regularized the services, the appellant…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.