Supreme Court of India
Manimegalai v. The Special Tahsildar (land Acquisition Officer) Adi Dravidar Welfare
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Held as under:- 13) In Exh.B-4, an extent of 2 cents of land in S. No. 123 has been sold for Rs. 4,752/-. The above sale transactions took place prior to the notification issued under Section 4(1) but the said transactions have been considered and rejected by the respondents.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – s.4(1), 5A, 18 – Part of appellant’s land acquired – Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs. 400/- per cent of land to the appellant – Subordinate Judge on reference u/s.18, granted compensation @ Rs. 2,500/- per cent – High Court reduced the compensation from Rs. 2,500/- to Rs. 1,670/- – On appeal, held: In the instant case, the land in question is situated adjacent to the National highway and is also near a busy area with various facilities – Respondent determined the value of the land in question based on the sale deed which had happened five…
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Dr. Abraham Patani of Mumbai & Anr v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2019 Moons Technologies Ltd. (formerly Known as Financial Technologies India Ltd.) & Ors. v. Union of India
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.