Supreme Court of India
M/s. Haryana Suraj Malting Ltd. v. Phool Chand
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: ss. 16, 17 and 17A – Ex-parte award – Power to recall, by the Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court after it becomes enforceable – Held: Industrial tribunal/labour court is not functus officio after the award has become enforceable, as far as setting aside an ex parte award is concerned – It is within its powers to entertain an application as per the scheme of the Act and in terms of the rules of natural justice – Merely because an award has become enforceable, does not necessarily mean that it has become binding – For an award to become binding, it should be passed…
Authorities it was built on
- 2004 Mehboob Dawood Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
- 2008 Radhakrishna Mani Tripathi v. L. H. Patel & Anr.
- 2005 Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Management of M/s. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. and Anr.
- 1989 Gram Panchayat, Village Kanonda, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Rohtak, through its Sarpanch v. Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Haryana, Chandigarh and Ors.
- 2004 M/s. Sangham Tape Company v. Hans Raj
- 1996 M/s. J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.