Supreme Court of India
Shyam Narayan Prasad v. Krishna Prasad and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, this appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Hindu Law – Mitakshara law – Property allotted to son in partition – Whether retains character of coparcenery property – Held: Share which a coparcener obtains on partition of ancestral property is ancestral property as regards his male issue – After partition, the property in the hands of the son will continue to be the ancestral property and the natural or adopted son of that son will take interest in it and is entitled to it by survivorship – On facts, properties acquired by son in the partition although are separate property qua other relations but it is a coparcenary property in so far…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 M.S. Ananthamurthy & Anr. v. J. Manjula
- 2019 Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur & Ors.
- 2019 Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel & Ors. v. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.