Supreme Court of India

Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India and Others

Neutral citation
Bench Dipak Misra, A. M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud JJ.
Decided 17 July 2018

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the aforesaid, we proceed to issue the following guidelines:- A. Preventive Measures (i) The State Governments shall designate, a senior police officer, not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, as Nodal Officer in each district.

Judgment, page 34

From the headnote

Constitution of India – Art. 32 – Cow protection groups indulging in violence – Cow vigilantism and other incidents of lynching – Writ petition u/Art. 32 seeking direction to State to take immediate and necessary action against the cow protection groups indulging in violence – Issuance of direction to remove the violent contents from the social media – Held: Act of lynching is unlawful – It is constitutional duty to take a call to protect lives and human rights – No citizen can assault the human dignity of another, for such an action would comatose the majesty of law – Authorities conferred…

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.