Supreme Court of India
Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Etc. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Etc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the Regularisation Rules must be given a pragmatic interpretation and the appellants, if they have completed 10 years of service on the date of NARENDRA KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. v.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Service Law – Regularisation of daily wage or contract workers – Appellants were irregularly appointed by the State of Jharkhand – Plea of Appellants that they had put in more than 10 years of service and therefore were entitled to be regularised – Plea rejected by the High Court – Further, High Court took the view that the decision of the Supreme Court in Umadevi (3) case did not permit regularisation of appellants since they had not worked for 10 years on the cut-off date of 10.04.2006 when the Constitution Bench rendered its decision – Held: High Court erred in taking an impractical view…
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 University of Delhi v. Delhi University Contract Employees Union & Ors.
- 2022 The State of Gujarat and Others v. R.J. Pathan and Others
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.