Supreme Court of India

Ram Murti Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Neutral citation
Bench Ashok Bhushan and Navin Sinha JJ.
Decided 10 December 2019

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the considered opinion that the order of compulsory retirement of the appellant calls for no interference.

Judgment, page 11

From the headnote

U.P. Fundamental Rules – r.56(c) – Compulsory Retirement of a Judicial Officer – Appellant while posted as a Chief Judicial Magistrate granted acquittal to the accused u/ss.467, 468, 471, 474, 420, 406 and 120B of IPC – complaint was lodged against the appellant with regard to the acquittal – vigilance enquiry was initiated and the report was adverse to the appellant – censure entry was recorded in his character roll and order of punishment was accepted by the appellant without any challenge – Screening Committee recommended compulsory retirement of the appellant – Thereafter, appellant was…

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.